Introduction
Social case work is a complex, dynamic,
and evolving
phenomenon. It is complex by virtue of
the varied
knowledge which feed it, the ethical
commitments which
infuse it, the special auspices and
conditions of its
practice, the objectives and ends which
guide it, the
skills which empower it. It is
complicated by the fact
that it deals with materials which are
in interaction and
change among themselves and also in
response to the
interaction of case work itself. As it
is experienced,
practiced, or thought about, the social
case work is a
living event. As such it cannot be
contained within a
definition. Yet we can try to define it
in a manner as it
is used by the practitioners.
Social case work is a process used by
certain human
welfare agencies to help individuals to
cope more
effectively with their problems in
social functioning.
Case work is both social and
psychological. The term
“social” implies which involves more
than one person;
the term “psychological” is that which
takes place within
an individual. Since the individual
does not live in a
vacuum, the content of much of his
inner experience is
“psycho-social.” In other words, there
is no real
dichotomy between the social and the
psychological.
There is an aspect of experience,
however, which belongs
to and is characterized by the
individual himself.
The nucleus of the case work event is
this: a person
with a problem comes to a place where a
professional
representative helps him by a given
process. Since this
is the heart of almost any situation
where a person seeks
professional help, the distinctive
characteristics must
be delineated.
There are four components of case work
known as the 4
P’s:
1. The Person
2. The Problem
3. The Place
4. The Process
Let us examine each, one by one
The Person
The person is a man, woman or child or
anyone who
finds himself/herself, or is found to
be, in need of help
in some aspect of his social-emotional
living, whether
the need be for tangible provisions or
counsel. As he/
she begins to receive help, he/she is
called a “client”. A
client is one who seeks professional
help, one who
employs the help of another or one who
is served by a
social agency or an institution.
David Landy has identified the process
a person goes
through in seeking help or becoming a
client:
1. The help seeker must decide
something is wrong.
2. The help seeker must face the probability
that
family, friends and neighbours will
know of his
disability.
3. The help seeker must decide to admit
to a helper
he is in distress, failed or is not
capable of handling
his own problem.
4. The help seeker must decide to
surrender enough
sovereignty and autonomy to place
himself in a
dependency role.
5. The help seeker must decide to
direct his search for
help among persons and resources known
to him.
6. The help seeker must decide to take
time off a job
or from other responsibilities to receive
help.
7. The help seeker may realize that in
receiving help
relationship with others may be
threatened.
The person seeking help brings to the
helping situation
concerns, needs and problems. The
person comes with
concerns, unmet needs and problems of
social
functioning. He/She comes from a
societal and cultural
milieu, a set of life experiences, and
a set of transactions
with other person’s that make the
person unique yet
sharing the commonalities of humankind.
The client of
a social agency is like the other
persons one has ever
known, but he/she is different too. In
broad ways he/
she is like all other human beings; in
a somewhat more
limited way he/she is like all other
human beings of
his age or time or culture. But, as one
moves from
understanding him/her simply as a human
being to
understanding him/her as this
particular human being,
one finds that, with all his/her’s
general likeness to
others, he/she is as unique as his
thumbprint. By
nuance and fine line and by the
particular way his/her
bone and brain and spirit are joined,
he/she is born
and grows as a personality different in
some ways from
every other individual of his/her
family, genus, or
species.
The client role calls for active
participation in the helping
endeavor, which includes furnishing appropriate
information to inform the decision
making process,
participation in the decision-making
process to the limits
of the clients ability and capacity,
and the carrying put
of the mutually agreed upon tasks.
Clients are of several types:
1. Those who ask for appropriate help
for themselves.
2. Those who ask for help for another
person or system.
3. Those who do not seek help but are
in some way
blocking or threatening the social
functioning of
another person (e.g., the neglectful
parent in a child
protection case).
4. Those who seek or use help as a
means to reach
their own goals or ends.
5. Those who seek help but for
inappropriate goals.
Identification of clients type is the
first step in the
delivery of service, for the
worker-client relationship and
interaction will vary depending on the
type of client and
the nature of help sought.
Felix Biestik has identified seven
needs of clients as
they come to the helping situation:
1. To be dealt with as an individual
rather than a type
or category.
2. To express feelings both positive
and negative.
3. To be accepted as a person of worth,
a person with
innate dignity.
4. Sympathetic understanding of and
response to
feelings expressed.
5. To be neither judged nor condemned
for the difficulty
in which the clients finds himself.
6. To make own choices and decisions
concerning one’s
own life.
7. To help keep confidential
information about self as
secret as possible.
The client is a person with both needs
and a problem(s).
The problem may be related to a client.
No one can ever
know the whole of another person,
though may
sometimes delude himself/herself to
that effect. The
reason for this lies not only in the
subtle dimensions
and interlacing of any personality but
also in the shift
and reorganization of new and old
elements in the
personality that take place
continuously just because
the person is alive in a live
environment and is in
interaction with it. Nevertheless, the
person is a whole
in any moment of his/her living. He/she
operates as a
physical, psychological, social entity,
whether on the
problem of his/her neurotic anxieties
or of his
inadequate income. He/she is a
product-in-process, so
to speak, of his/her constitutional makeup,
his/her
physical and social environment,
his/her past
environment, his/her experiences,
his/her present
perceptions and reactions, and even
his/her future
aspirations. It is this
physical-psychological-social-pastpresent-
future configuration that he/she brings
to every
life-situation he/she encounters.
The person’s behaviour has this purpose
and meaning
to gain satisfaction, to avoid and
dissolve frustration and
to maintain his/her balance- in-
movement.
To understand a person, it is important
to know his/
her parts of personality that is Id
(life forces of the
individual), ego (conscious, drivers
gliding our
personality forces) and superego
(unconscious, ethical
values and principles) which have an
important role in
governing his/her behaviour.
Whether a person’s behaviour is or is
not effective in
promoting his/her well-being depends in
large part
upon the functioning of his/her
personality structure.
The forces of the human personality
combine in three
major functions: (1) the life energies
that seek
satisfactory outlets; (2) the check
system, automatic or
voluntary, that halts, modifies, or
re-channel these drives
to make their ends acceptable to their
owner and his/
her environment; and (3) the organizing
and governing
operations that controls the negotiations
and balances
within the person himself/herself, as
between what he/
she wants and what he/she can and ought
to do, and
between himself and his/her physical
environment.
Freud, a psychologist defined them as
id, ego and
superego. The harmonious concerted
action of these
forces in one makes for personal and
social balance and
competence; their discord of faultiness
is revealed in
behaviour that is personally thwarting
or socially
unacceptable.
A person at any stage of his/her life
is not only “a
product” of nature but is also and
always “in process” of
being in the present and becoming in
the future. What
happens to the individual today may be
as vital to him/
her as what happened yesterday. Those
physical, social
and interpersonal situations he
encounters in his/her
operations today as worker, parent,
spouse, student or
client will have an impact upon him/her
and will respond
that can affect his/her development
either morbidly or
benignly.
The persons “being and becoming”
behaviour is both
shaped and judged by the expectations
he/she and his/
her culture have invested in the status
and the major
social role he/she carries- a man may
be a father, a
son, an employee, a club member and a
client of the
case worker, all in the space of a few
hours. His/her
social role consists of the major
function he/she carries
at a given time with broadly designated
behaviour,
responsibility and rewards. His/her
conflict may be
cause by his recognition of what his
role calls for and
his emotional inability to meet it.
The person who comes as client to a
social agency is
always under stress. Regardless of the
client’s reason
for coming for help, the client brings
much more than
concerns, needs or problems to the
helping situation.
The client brings the total self as a
biological,
psychosocial, cultural and spiritual
being. This include
the resources of self and the personal
environment and
also environmental constraints. What
the client brings
includes perceptions of self and the
situations and
patterns of coping with stress and
patterns of
interpersonal relationships. The
clients present need
and/or problem is affected in part by
the way
developmental needs have been met and
by needs
arising from the diverse aspects of the
client’s lifestyle
and from the expectations of the
client’s environment.
One of the major tasks of the worker is
to understand
the client as a unique person in a
unique situation.
There can never be total knowledge
about a client; that
is impossible. The worker seeks
knowledge about the
client that is needed for giving the
service to be delivered.
The client is the major source of the
facts used to develop
the understanding of the person in the
situation.
Before a person seeks help from a
social agency, he or
she has usually attempted to deal with
a problem in a
way that has worked with previous
problems commonly
known as “coping”. Coping results not
only in solving
problems but in the reduction of
tension and anxiety. If
the coping is not successful, a person
may then turn to
his or her natural support system ,that
is, friends,
relatives, associates etc. Thus,
individuals often come to
the agency after a period of
unsuccessful attempts to
deal with their problems.
The Problem
Problem, according to the America
Heritage dictionary
is a “question or situation that
presents uncertainty,
perplexity or difficulty”. This
definition is rather
inadequate without elaboration for
defining in this
chapter.
1) When does a situation become
problematic?
2) When does a problematic situation
become
appropriate for social work concern?
Clarification of the term becomes
somewhat easier if
one looks at a problem in terms of both
need and social
functioning,. Concern for and need of
human systems
is the basis of the social work
response. When the need
is seen as mitigating a block to social
functioning, a
problem of concern to social work is
said to exist. This
concern should be understood also to
include potential
blocks to human functioning so as to
include preventive
as well as ameliorative concerns. The
perplexing situation
is then related to removal of the
obstacle that blocks
need fulfillment. For problem solution,
goals are related
to need fulfillment.
In order to work out a problem, one
must first understand
it, comprehend it and be oriented too
In the attempt to
understand any problem, there must be
some analysis
of it, some translation into other
familiar terms, some
sets of associations which can be
brought to it. This is
the way case worker function when they
are confronted
with a problem. They must come to the
point where
they can see through it. The frame of
reference which is
used in seeing through the problem may
vary, but the
necessity to understand, it is
universal. Moreover, one
must understand not only the nature of
the problem,
as a social, economic or psychological
entity but also
the personal context of the problem, in
other words the
personalities which are involved in it.
No service can be
administered effectively without such
understanding.
Dimensions of how a problem arises:
1. The problem arises from some need or
obstacle or
accumulation of frustrations or
maladjustments and
sometimes all of these together which
threatens or
has already attacked the adequacy of
the person’s
living situation or the effectiveness
of his/her efforts
to deal with it.
2. The social-functioning problem may
rest in
interpersonal relationships; for
example, the
inability of a parent to understand an
adolescent
child’s need and thus, is so strict
that the
relationship between parent and child
is at the point
where there is open rebellion and an
inability to
discuss the situation
3. The problem may rest in an inability
to negotiate
with systems in the environment for
e.g., a patient
in a hospital is unable to ask the
doctor the questions
that are bothering the patient or to
make his/her
concerns known to the doctor.
4. The problem may rest in inadequate
or inappropriate
role performance; for example, the
parent does not
meet the nutritional needs of the child
or maintain
a suitable home for that child. May be
one of
deficiency; that is, an individual does
not have either
the material resources or the personal
capacity
(temporary or permanent) to carry out
the task
needed for coping with a situation. An
older person
with a limited income and limited
physical capacity
may not be able to maintain a home or
fix nutritious
meals.
5. One may not have the preparation
needed to carry
out a social role. For example, the
mother who did
not have adequate mothering as a child
and has
received no instruction in childcare
may not be able
to properly care for her child because
she just does
not know how to care for small
children.
6. May be due to disturbances or
disorder resulting
in intrapsychic turmoil, constriction
or distortion.
For e.g. the person may be mentally ill
or have some
perpetual difficulties which result in
using
inappropriate or ineffective means for
coping with
life situations.
7. May be there is discrepancies
between expectations
of a person and the demands of various
segments of
that person’s environment. For example,
an
individual expects that food, clothing
and shelter
will be provided by a social agency
without work on
his/her part, but the agency can only
provide
partially for those needs.
8. Problems may arise due to
discrepancies between
environmental demands and personal
needs. For
example, a teenage girl whose mother is
ill is
expected to care for younger siblings,
but she needs
time for completing her education and
for
socialization with her peers.
According to Perlman, the social
functioning focus of
social work began to emerge when problems
were seen
not as pathological but as part of
life. Problems are
frequent and unexpected in the human
situation, and
solutions are usually found without
professional help.
The concern of social work narrowed to
those problems
in which persons cannot readily unblock
the fulfillment
of need with their own resources.
Problem in social work
usage refers to a social-functioning
situation in which
need fulfillment of any of the persons
or systems involved
is blocked or has a significant
potential of blockage, and
in which the person involved cannot by
themselves
remove the block to need fulfillment.
Characteristics of a client’s problem:
1. The problems within the purview of
social case work
are those which vitally affect or are
affected by a
persons social functioning. The problem
may be
some unmet needs-economic, medical,
educational,
recreational-which hampers or
undermines a
person’s adequate living. Or it may be
one of stresspsychological,
social, physical- which causes the
person to be ineffective or disturbed
in carrying his/
her social roles.
2. The multifaceted and dynamic nature
of the client’s
problem makes necessary the selection
by the case
worker and client of some part of it as
the unit for
work. Three main considerations enter
into the
choice of problem focus: 1) what the
client wants 2)
what the case worker’s professional
judgment’s
points to as possible and desirable
solutions and 3)
What the agency is for and can offer.
3. Problems in any part of a human
beings living tend
to have “chain reaction.” This is
because while in
the study of a person he/she may be
compartmentalized and analyzed as a
biological or
psychological or social entity, a
person lives a
dynamic interrelated whole, reacting to
and upon
the dynamic whole of his/her environment.
Whatever hurts one parts of his/her
living will have
its impact in other parts.
4. Any problem which a person
encounters has both
an objective and a subjective
significance. A problem
may be seen and understood by an
onlooker; it is
felt by its carrier, and it is
experienced with the
particularity of individual difference.
Two aged men
unable to work and needs money. This is
a simple
problem for which there is a ready
solution in the
form of age old assistance, yet it may
not feel simple
for the two. One may feel depressed by
the problem
itself-that he is old, is found
useless, and is dumped
by employers and so on. The other may
accept his
ageing and feels he has a right to be
“given a hand”,
but his anger and anxiety are aroused
by the
solution proffered-he cannot see why he
must prove
residence in his state or how he is
expected to
manage on so little money. Case worker
must elicit
and often deal with such feelings so
that they may
implement rather than obstruct the
client’s work
on his/her problem.
5. Not only do the external (objective)
and internal
(subjective) aspects of the problem
co-exist, but
either one may be the cause of the
other. Everyone
encounters situations in ones social
living that, by
his/her own momentary or chronic
inability to deal
with them, create internal problem in
oneself. Case
work help in problem solving, provides
other things,
an intervention which breaks or
modifies the causeeffect
chain of difficulties. Since this
intervention
may in itself prove problematic to the
client, the
social case work must seek to
understand his/her
means and processes as astutely as is
possible so
that he/she may facilitate rather than
complicate
the client’s problem solving efforts.
The Place
The place is a social service agency or
a social service
department of another kind of human
welfare agency.
The place to which the person comes for
help with his/
her problem is known as a social
agency. The term
“agency” has a misleading American
sound, but it was
used in British case work literature in
the late
nineteenth century. Present day usage
refers to the
institution within which the case
worker practices;
sometimes it is the larger institution
that is intended
(e.g. the local authority) and at other
times it is the
smaller social work microcosm (e.g. the
psychiatric social
work department in a mental hospital).
The institutions
in which case workers practice
(schools, child guidance
clinics, children’s departments of the
hospitals and
courts and so on) have all been
established to achieve
certain broad social purposes and case
workers have a
part to play in achieving them. Its
purpose is to help
individuals with the particular social
handicaps which
hampers good personal or family living
and with the
problems created by faulty
person-to-person, personto-
group or person-to-situation
relationships. This
agency’s purpose and functions come to
life in the person
and professional performance of the
case worker.
Social case work agencies differ one
from the other in a
number of ways, but there are three
major factors that
determine their classification:
1. Their source of support- public
taxation (child
welfare, physical and mental health
programmes etc)
or voluntary contribution.
2. Their source of professional
authority – primary
agencies carry full authority and
responsibility for
their social functions and secondary
agencies derive
their authority and responsibility from
the host
agency.
3. Their special function and area of
concern- primary
agencies both public and private, may
define certain
areas of social need as the particular
fielding in
which they give services. Secondary,
case work help
is related to the work of some other
profession, such
as medicine, education or law and to
its specific
knowledge and purpose.
Perlman has described some of the
characteristics of
Agency:
1. The social agency is an organization
fashioned to
express the will of a society or of
some group in that
society. An agency embodies a society’s
decision to
protect its members against social
breakdowns, to
prevent their maladjustments and/or to
promote the
development of better or higher levels
of humans
functioning.
2. Each social agency develops a
programme by which
to meet the particular areas of need
with which it
sets out to deal-The agency programme
consists of
the aids and activities by which its
intent is
translated into provisions of help. The
ways and
means which an agency programme
provides will
convey its function effectively or not,
depending on
a number of factors: money, the
knowledge and
competency of the agency staff; the
interest,
resources and support of the community;
the
consistency between ascertained needs
and the
proffered means.
3. The social agency has a structure by
which it
organizes and delegates its
responsibilities and
tasks, and governing policies and
procedures by
which it stabilizes and systematizes
its operationsstructure,
as it may be depicted on an
organizational
chart, is the agency’s anatomy. The
agency’s body
is made up of many members with
different purposes
and powers, all dependent upon one
another in the
body’s total working. The structure of
an agency
identifies and assigns separate and
joint
responsibilities, authorities and tasks
to each
personnel and demarcates the
relationship among
various functions in the total agency
body.
4. The social agency is a living,
adaptable organism
susceptible to being understood and
changed, much
as other living organisms-If agency
structure may
be seen as its anatomy, its operations
may represent
its physiology, and the purposes,
attitudes, and goal
directions of its personnel and board
are its
psychology. The circumstance of its
inception, the
person’s who nurtured it and the social
situations
it encountered will have affected the
agency’s present
behaviour.
5. Every staff member in an agency
speaks and acts
for some part of the agency’s function,
and the case
worker represents the agency in its individualized
problem-solving help-What a case worker
can do with
and for his client derives both from
his professional
commitment and skill and from the
agency which
hires him/her. In order to represent
the agency,
he/she must be psychologically
identified with the
purpose and the policies of his/her
agencies. Every
social agency banks a fund of knowledge
about the
experience with the particular problems
it has set
out to solve.
6. The case worker, while representing
his/her agency,
is first and foremost a representative
of his/her
profession-The social case
worker practices in the
conviction that individual human
welfare is the
purpose and the test of social policy;
that his/her
attitude combine open enquiry with
dedication to
the people and the person he/she
serves; that he/
she maintains “social-conscience” and
that he/she
conducts himself ethically in all
his/her professional
transactions.
Social work is an agency-based profession.
The agency
is the immediate environment of the
worker-client
interaction. This interaction often
takes place in an office
or building identified as the “agency”.
The influence of
the agency is strong even when the
interaction takes
place elsewhere in the community. As an
employee, the
worker is a part of the agency system,
and because of
this the worker is accountable to the
agency. The form
and content of the service offered must
be within the
agency’s purview and guidelines. The
manner in which
the agency is structured and functions
greatly influence
the nature of the worker-client
interaction. The agency
also provides resources for both the
worker and the
client.
The agencies are established to carry
out broad social
functions as healing and rehabilitation
in the case of
hospitals, ensuring good parental care
in the case of
children’s department of the local
authority and so on.
The worker is expected to contribute to
these objectives
and to clarify and develop his/her own
function within
this broad social purpose. Yet, the
most important aspect
of agency function is that it
constitutes the meeting
point of social worker and the client,
it is what brings
them together and gives meaning and
sustenance to
their continued contact. The community
provides
financial and other support and
sanction for the agency;
community attitudes impact the agency
and its capacity
to deliver services. It also has
expectations for the nature
and outcome of services. There are two
kinds of
expectations: the professional and the
bureaucratic. The
greater the organizations, the larger
the differences.
Bureaucratic expectations call for
loyalty to the
organization; acceptance of authority
from achievement
of goals, on specialization and on
efficiency. Professional
expectations call for commitment to
professional values
and to the service of clients; ability
to have a broad span
of decision-making power; collegial
relationship and an
emphasis on meeting client need and
allowing for client
self-determination and
individualization.
Before a worker can effectively deliver
service as a
professional in a bureaucratic
organization, the worker
must first understand the organization.
The first task
in understanding an agency is to define
its boundaries.
The second task is to determine environmental
factors
that influence the structure and
functioning of the
agency. The third task is to understand
the structure
and functioning of the agency system.
Social worker not only needs to
understand the agency
in which they are employed but they also
need to be
able to understand other social
agencies. This is
important if the worker is to help the
clients in order to
use the resources and services of other
agencies.
The Process
The process, is a progressive
transaction between the
professional helper (the case worker)
and the client. It
consists of a series of problem solving
operations carried
out within a meaningful relationship.
The end of this
process is contained in its means: to
influence the clientperson
that he/she develops effectiveness in
coping with
his/her problem and /or to so influence
the problem as
to resolve it or reduce its effects. As
the social worker
develops skill in the problem-solving
process, thinking
about the phenomena being confronted
will begin to
take place in orderly steps. These
steps appear to be
simple but are quite complex in
application.
Sal Hofstein states: “Process refers to
the recurrent
patterning of a sequence of change over
time and in a
particular direction.” It is important
to note three
qualities of this process: 1) recurrent
patterning or stages
2) takes place over time 3) in a
particular direction (the
process is irreversible).The
problem-solving process as
used in social work has its source in
the classic work of
John Dewey and in his description of the thought
process used by human beings when
confronted with
difficult situations. Social work
problem solving is
finding a way through feeling,
thinking, and acting. It
progresses over time in a cyclical,
irreversible manner
that is focused on removing blocks to
need fulfillment
that individuals cannot remove with
their own resources.
In order to understand what the case
work process must
include in its problem-solving help, it
is necessary for the
social case worker to take stock first
of the kinds of
blockings which occur in people’s
normal problem-solving
effort. These six are among the most
common:
1. A problem cannot be solved if the
necessary tangible
means and resources are not available
to the person.
A client, for instance, may see and
assess his/her
problem and its solution accurately and
may lack
only the material provision for it.
2. Sometimes, people are unable to
solve their
problems simply out of ignorance or
misapprehension about the facts of the
problems or
the facts of existing ways of meeting
it.
3. A problem is difficult of resolution
when the person
who has depleted or drained of
emotional or physical
energy. He/she needs to mobilized
himself/herself-
”pull himself together’- when he/she
must plan and
act according to plan.
4. When problems sets off a
conflagration of feeling, a
person’s thought processes, delicately
attuned as
they are to his/her emotions become
clouded and
tumbled about.
5. The problem may lie within the
person: i.e, he/she
may have become subject to, or victim
of, emotions
that chronically, over a long time have
governed his/
her thinking and action.
6. Some people find problems in solving
a difficult
situation because they have never
developed
systematic habits of orderly methods of
thinking and
planning. So, the difficulty lies
chiefly in the
person’s lack of experience in
organizing his/her
power to grapple with problems.
In the case work relationship, a
constant medium is
provided that is accepting, nurturing
and supporting at
the same time that the stimulus of
problem-solving work
is injected to promote the client’s
effort to feel, to be or
to act in the ways leading to his/her
better social
adjustment. The case work process
sustains and fortifies
the functions of the client’s ego. The
first part of the
case work process, as in all
problem-solving, is to
ascertain and clarify the facts of the
problem. The second
aspect of case work problem-solving
grows out of and
interweaves with the ongoing eliciting
of facts, it is
thinking through the facts. The
conclusive phase of each
problem-solving effort in case work is
the making of some
choice or decision.
Stages of Problem-solving Process
1. Preliminary statement of the
problem,
2. Statement of preliminary assumptions
about the
nature of the problem,
3. Selection and collection of
information,
4. Analysis of information available,
5. Development of a plan,
6. Implementation of the plan, and
7. Evaluation of the plan.
1) Preliminary statement of the
problem-A clear
statement of the problem is necessary
before
processing to subsequent steps. Often,
problem
statement tends to be vague, global,
and lacking in
precision. For example, school dropouts
or unwed
mothers are often referred to as
problems. A more
adequate formulation in the area of
unwed mothers
might be: lack of educational resources
for teenage
pregnant girls. In this statement, the
need of the
individual and society is education.
2) Statement of preliminary
assumptions about the
nature of the problem-This step is necessary to help
make explicit the type of information
needed for
understanding and planning. As the
problem is
stated, implicit assumptions are made about
its
nature and cause, which provide
indications as to
the need in the situation and as to the
block to
need fulfillment.
3) Selection and collection of
information-Sources
for information should include a
variety of
perspectives that may be chosen from
historical,
social-psychological, biological,
economic, political,
religious, and ethical understandings.
Both the facts of the problem itself
and the meaning
of the problem to those concerned are
important.
Skill in the collection of information
also calls for
skill in communication and social
interaction with
persons who are sources of the
information. The
values of social work call for the
client to be a primary
source. There is a need to determine
and accumulate
relevant evidence about the situation, and
this
evidence needs to be related to the
salient features
of the situation.
4) Analysis of information available-
Analysis of
information is influenced and directed
by the
purpose for which the analysis is to be
used. Other
purposes include determination of
feasible goals and
possible outcomes and of possible plans
of action,
interpretation of the meaning of the
information
gathered, and evaluation. The cyclical
nature of the
process becomes very apparent, for one
returns to
analysis as an ingredient of each step
of the process.
The carrying out of the process
generates new
information.
5) Development of a plan-Information
and its analysis
lead to understanding of what can be
done to remove
obstacles blocking need fulfillment. A
social worker
uses assessment in developing a plan of
action.
Plans develop from a consideration of a
variety of
possible strategies and techniques. As
a plan
becomes more specific, the social
worker will return
to early steps in the process to gather
and analyze
new information needed for the
specifics of planning.
Consideration of a variety of plans is
important in
creative planning.
6) Implementation of the plan-In
social work,
implementation involves interaction
between people
and is interventive in nature. It is
action based on
thinking that has its source in
feelings about
concern or need. In addition, it is
action based on
substantial knowledge from many sources
that
explain and predict behaviour of
persons in the
situation.
7) Evaluation of the plan-This
step may result in
redefinition of the problem, expanded
information
gathering and analysis, of
reformulation of the plan.
If the goal has been reached,
evaluation is an
appropriate and necessary climax to the
process.
Regardless of the outcome of the plan,
evaluation of
what happened can lead to an
understanding that
can be transferred to other situations
and to more
effective problem solving in those
situations.
The intent of the case work process is
to engage the
person himself/herself both in working
on and in coping
with the one or several problems that
confront him/her
and to do so by such means as may stand
him/her in
good stead as he/she goes forward in
living.
These therapeutic means are as follows:
1) The provision of a therapeutic
relationship that
sustains the client and effects the
nature of his/
her emotional relation to his/her
problems;
2) The provision of a systematic,
though always flexible,
way by which the client may discuss and
work over
the nature of his/her problem, his/her
relation to
it and its potential solutions; and
3) The provision of such opportunities
and aids (those
of communication and/or resources) as
will further
exercise and implement the client’s
adaptive action
upon his/her problems.
Three essential operations of
problem-solving process
are
1. The facts that constitute and bear
upon the problem
must be ascertained and grasped. Such
facts may
be of objective reality and of
subjective reaction, of
cause and effect, of relatedness
between the person
and his/her problems, of the solution
sought and
of the actual means available;
2. The facts must be thought about. The
facts must be
played upon and organized by
ideas-ideas springing
from knowledge and experience and subject
to the
governing aim of problem solution;
3. Some choice or decision must be made
that is the
end result of the consideration of the
particular facts
and that affects or has the intent of
resolving the
problem.
The process can be conceptualized as having
four major
components: assessment, planning,
action and
termination. Although assessment
precedes planning,
planning precedes action and action
precedes
termination, the process is cyclical in
nature.
Planning often leads to the need for
new or different
understanding of the person in the
situation
(assessment). Action often produces new
information
for use in understanding or
demonstrates the need for
additional planning. Evaluation, the
assessment of what
has happened as a result of action, is
ongoing in the
process and leads to new understanding
and sometimes
to new plans and action. Thus, all four
stages are always
present, but at various points in the
work one or more
may be the focus and receive the most
attention.
All four stages as well as the
interactional process
constitute intervention. All can
influence changes in
the transactions between clients and
the systems in
their environment. All can influence
the social
functioning of individuals and social
systems.
The aim of case work process is to
engage the client
with his/her problem and his/her will
to do something
about it in a working relationship with
the agency, its
intentions and special means of
helpfulness. The context
of the process is a fairly constant
one, and its method is
a fairly systematic one-as constant and
as systematic as
a process keyed to living, feeling,
changing human
beings can be-while it yet remains
fluid and flexible.
Finally, for the solution or mitigation
of many problems
there must exists certain material
means or accessible
opportunities which are available to
the needful person
and which he/she can be helped to use.
Money, medical
care, nursery schools, scholarship,
short-stay homes,
foster homes, recreational facilities-
these are the kind
of resources that any person may need
in order to resolve
a given problem in his/her daily
living. The case worker
should know about these resources or
know how to
become informed of them. He/She should
be able to
pick the right ones imaginatively in
their relation to the
client’s problem.
Conclusion
At the door of the agency, stands the
person, who has a
problem. It may be simple or complex,
old or new,
commonplace or peculiar, but it always
has significance
to the person: it is something that
he/she is experiencing
as he/she is frustrated in his/her
present living
situation, and it is something that
he/she finds he/she
cannot cope with unaided. The problem
which the
person carries to the agency, sometimes
clutches to
him/her tightly, sometimes
distastefully held out at
fingers tip, hurts or incapacitates him
today. The social
agency is prepared to receive and if
possible to give help
to the person whose problem brings
him/her to it. The
agency has a stated purpose, a special
set of functions,
structures, policies and procedures,
which they have
validated. In other words, the problem
must be one with
which the agency is equipped to help.
From the facts
regarding the problem and out of the
client’s verbal and
behavioural responses, the case
worker’s understanding
of the client grows. The case worker
understands what
are the inner and outer resources the
client brings to
the problems solving situation.
The case worker must not only be a keen
listener but
also an active agent in helping the
client to communicate
about his/her problem and focus his/her
attention and
expand his/her understanding of the
client. He/she must
also focus on the purpose of the agency
and ability to
help.
Problem solving implies that both the
case worker and
his/her client are simultaneously and
consciously,
though differently, engaged in
problem-solving from the
beginning. The clients sharing and
working-through his
feelings, and the impetus and help
given to him/her to
know and think about his/her attitudes,
behaviour,
needs and goals are in themselves an
experience and
experience of adaptation. The
by-product of both these
ongoing activities yields the case
worker a large part of
what becomes his/her diagnosis. And the
taking of next
steps out of considered choice, the
planning of action
or the internal settlement arrived at
involves the executive
and integrative functions of the ego.
Three interrelated guides have been set
down to achieve
and hold focus on dealing with helping
the client who
comes to the agency: the selection 1)
of that problem or
aspect of which the client himself
feels is most important;
2) of that part of his total problem
which falls within the
helping function of the agency; and 3)
of that problem
which in the worker’s judgment most
need and can yield
to help
The mental work of examining the parts
of a problem
for th e import of their particular
nature and organization,
for the interrelationship among them,
for the
relationship between them and the means
to their
solution is known as a diagnostic
process. Diagnosis
must result in a “design for action”.
Probably no process
has been as troubling to case workers
as diagnosis. The
content of case work diagnosis falls
into the triangular
pattern as that of other professional
design for action. It
consist of: 1) The nature of the
problem brought and
the goals sought by the client, in
their relationship to
2) the nature of the person who bears
the problem (his
social and psychological situation and
functioning) and
who seeks (or needs) help with his
problem, in relation
to 3) the nature of the purpose of the
agency and the
kind of help it can offer and /or make
available. The
content of the case work diagnosis,
then, is focused,
weighted and bounded by the purpose and
means of
the client and the agency.
No comments:
Post a Comment