Showing posts with label recording. Show all posts
Showing posts with label recording. Show all posts

Wednesday, 4 December 2013

Principles of Recording



How we wish, especially in the initial stages of practice
that there were some fixed rules and perfect procedures,
which could guide us in writing case records. However
there is no such thing as an ideal or model record.
Record is a flexible instrument, which should be adapted
to the needs of the case.
Each case is different, the conditions of work hold
marked differences and the recording therefore, rests
not on following an outline, but in the mastery of certain
component processes. Given below, are the attributes
one looks for in a good case records whereby we can
judge it to its merits. They can be termed as principles
of casework recording as they serve as guidelines for
writing records.
1) Accuracy, objectivity, simplicity, clarity and brevity
should be observed in writing records.
2) Facts and their interpretation should be
distinguished as it leads to objectivity. Inferences
should be drawn in an impartial manner without
attempting to influence the judgment of the reader
(e.g., frequent fights between the husband and wife
might lead the caseworker to interpret that she
dislikes or hates her husband).
3) Record must be orderly in its arrangement and it
is not possible unless the writer has thought out in
advance what should be included and then has set
out the material in a logical sequence.
4) A long record is not necessarily a good record.
Records should neither be too long nor too short.
5) The casework records are not meant to be literary
masterpieces, therefore they should be written in
simple language and simple style.
6) A telling verbatim quote can sometimes depict a
situation much better than a narrative description,
therefore, wherever possible reaction of the clients
should be recorded in their own words.
7) There should be certain degree of uniformity and
standardization as to the form of observation.
8) A record should have readability and visibility and
should contain a clear and concise presentation of
the material.(E.g. content can be organised under
topical heading such as interviews, home visits,
contact with collaterals. Letters, medical reports
etc filed at appropriate place.)
9) To maintain clarity and accuracy avoid using words
which are vague, ambiguous and likely to be
misinterpreted by the readers. (e.g. “middle aged,
perhaps etc.) Note taking as far as possible should
be done immediately after the interview is over. If
done during the course of interview it may not only
hamper the full participation of caseworker in the
process but may make the client feel that she is
not getting the full attention of the caseworker.
10) It should always be made clear who are involved in
the situation, which is addressing whom and what
are the sources of information.
11) The details of every significant subject or situation
should be given.
12) One should not record the self-evident, the
insignificant, the familiar, and the repetitive.
14) Any record should show clearly the nature of the
problem presented or the request made; what the
worker thinks about the situation; what the worker
and client know about it; what relevant family group
and community factors are involved; what the
change or movement of outcome are.

Types of Recording



From the literature available on casework recording no
clear cut classification of records on the basis of their
types is available. However, for our understanding we
can give the following classification of recording.
(a) Process (b) Summary (c) Verbatim (d) Non-
Verbatim
Process Recording
Process recording is a form of recording used frequently
by the caseworker. In this type, the process of interview
is reported and is a rather detailed description of what
transpired with considerable paraphrasing. It preserves
a sequence in which the various matters were
discussed. It includes not only what both the worker
and the client said but also significant reaction of the
client and changes in mood and response. In this the
interview and observation go hand-in-hand. It may be
verbatim or non-verbatim reproduction.
Summary Recording
Summary is a good device for organising and analyzing
facts. Summary points into meaning and relative
importance of material gathered. A careful summary
made at appropriate intervals reduces bulk, clarifies
direction and saves the workers, time. Summary is
commonly assumed to be a review or recapitulation of
material that has already appeared in the record. It
may be either topically arranged or may appear as
condensed chronological narrative.
Mrs. Sheffield has defined summary in social casework
recording as “A digest of significant facts in the client’s
history which has previously been recorded”. Summary
could be a diagnostic summary, periodic summary or
closing summary.
The closing summary is a summary made at the time
the case is closed. To be most effective it should be
written by the worker who was responsible for the case
at the time of closing.
The periodic summary is simply the summary of material
previously recorded and is made at more or less regular
intervals or at the end of more or less definite episodes
in the family history.
Verbatim Recording
It is reproduction of factual data in the individual’s own
words. It is commonly used in casework because of its
accuracy and objectivity. However, it should not become
a mechanical reproduction of information because
casework as an art requires an intelligent selection
and rearrangement of material. As a part of training of
the worker, verbatim recording may be of value in
developing objectivity.
Non-verbatim /narrative recording
Narrative recording has been and still is a predominant
style of recording. It is the style found in newspapers
and magazines. It is the way we speak of the day’s
events, it is the way we write letters, and it is the ways
we keep diaries. Narrative form of recording is preferred
for reporting acts of practical helpfulness, events and
most collateral visits or conferences. It may be used for
the contents of the interview in all instances except
when the process itself and use of relationship have
special significance.

Case Recording: Concept



After the interviewing process is over the caseworker
has the obligation to record the interview. The language
of interview now has to be translated into the language
of the record (file, forms, computer).
According to Kadushin recording can be seen as a part
of the interview process. Through the act of recording
the interview continues in the mind of the interviewer
after it is terminated. It is a retrospective living of the
encounter. As a consequence the interviewer of
necessity, has to selectively decide which aspects of
the interview were more significant. She has to
systematically organise a somewhat chaotic experience.
What is a Case Record?
A record literally means ‘a formal writing of any fact or
proceeding’ and when used as a verb means ‘to set down
in writing or other permanent form’.
Taking cue from this we can define case record as a
written account of the casework proceedings.
However, from the above statement one should not
conclude that case recording is an easy, routine and
simple task, far from it, its a highly skilled and complex
task. Recording is an important and integral part of
casework procedure and is an output of the activity of
the casework. The importance of recording lies both in
the process as well as the product.
For, an individual who is planning to become a
caseworker, the art of record writing is worth striving
to develop and perfect, not only because case recording
is an essential part of good casework and is becoming a
more important factor with the increasing complexity
of social treatment, but also because the case record
is fortunately or unfortunately often used as one of
the important indexes of the caseworkers ability.
A question often asked is, why do we need to write
records? Do they really serve any purpose? The
importance of case records can be ascertained when
we look at their functions and the varied purposes they
serve.