Social defence is generally understood as the protection of
society against
crime through a systematically organized and coherent action
by both the State and
civil society. Though this term has long been in use in the
criminological and
penological literature, the modes and modalities of
achieving its inherent objective
have been shifting with the advancement in social sciences
and behavioural
disciplines. Even today, because of the complexity of issues
involved, it has not been
possible to evolve a wholly satisfactory theoretical
framework for policy formulation
and programme development in this field. It is true that
crime is essentially an
offshoot of the disorganizational process of society itself
and, as such, it is difficult of
visualize a system that could completely neutralize an
‘aggression’ which originates
from within. Then, in the absence of any fool-proof theory
of crime causation, it is
beyond human capacity to create a society entirely free from
crime. Moreover, the
definition of crime itself may vary from country to country
and within the same
country from time to time, in keeping with the changes in
social structure, cultural
values and normative expectations and no single system can
hold good for different
situations. Despite this position, there is a candid
awareness that the objective behind
social defence cannot be realized merely by focussing on
individuals who are
recognized as offenders; it inevitably requires also
reaching out to those who are
vulnerable to crime. Thus, the social defence approach aims
not only at perfecting the
system that deals with offenders but also at forestalling
conditions that generate
criminality. In this process, it closely interacts with
various sectors of socio-economic
development in creating an environment conducive to the
prevention of crime and in
mobilizing resources appropriate for the treatment and
rehabilitation of offenders in
the totality of their life situations.
No comments:
Post a Comment