Showing posts with label history of social work. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history of social work. Show all posts

Tuesday, 3 December 2013

PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES FOR SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION IN INDIA

1. Introduction
India is very fortunate to have a good beginning of professional Social Work under the leadership of Sir Clifford Manshardt, the founder director of its first school of Social Work, now popularly known as Tata Institute of Social Sciences at Mumbai.
This visionary personality enunciates that professional training in Social Work stands for soundness of essential principles of education, for flexibility of method and for a working relationship with the whole professional field that will give both perspective
and depth to its educational program. While the school, as a graduate institution (at the time of inception) sought to maintain high academic standard, it also sought to be eminently practical, applying the best of modern social thought to the solution of the
present day social problems. He believed that scholarly activities are not incompatible with simplicity and commonsense, and that the professional Social Worker is to develop his ability to give himself an intelligent, skillful and disinterested service to others. To
be eminently practical, Manshardt propounded that the activities of a high grade school of Social Work should fall into three general fields: the Academic Curriculum encompassing adequate knowledge of human nature, appreciation of environmental
background, an adequate philosophy and conception of normal human relations and knowledge of all other available sources of relief; practical work or Field Work and Social Research which is both scholarly and accurate while being eminently practical
dealing with the everyday problems of social life (Manshardt,1985, 5). In India, professional social work owe its origin to a short-term training course on social service organized by the social service league at Bombay. The training course included those men and women who were willing to volunteer them for social service.
Till that time social workers did not get any salary of remuneration for their work. It was simply a social service to the needy people guided by the principle of humanity. Later on, the Tata School of Social Sciences was established in the year of 1936 in Bombay. The institute started a course of professional training in social work. In the year 1947 another school of social work known as Delhi School of Social Work was established. In the same year Kashi Vidyapeeth, Varanasi and Baroda similar schools were started (Bhattacharya, 2011: 85).
Seventy five years of professional Social Work in India has been marked by few triumphs and too many travails that warrant a serious discussion on what the future holds for a ‘profession’ beleaguered by several internal and external constraints and considerations including Inbreeding in several institutions, lack of indigenous literature, weightage for fieldwork, and the fact that most social work educators are not practitioners unlike the counter parts in several developed countries. Hardly any genuine effort made for Continuous Professional Development (CPD), development of field (service) action projects, non-professionals at education and training, lack of standards in education and training, strengthening of national bodies, and for establishing a ‘National Council for Social Work Education and Training in India’.


2. Objectives
To look in to the history and growth of social work education in India To introspect the problems and challenges To draws the recommendations in three dimensions to address those problems and challenges both exiting and expected in the futures also.
The University Grants Commissions appointed the First Review Committee for Social Work Education in 1960 and the Second Review Committee in 1975 for the promotion, maintenance of standards of education, coordination of social work education,
training, research and practice. The important recommendation of the review committee was to establish National Council in Social Work Education for the promotion and development of social work education in India. The third review committee in 2001 spoke the need of relating social work education to the social realities. It recommended the curriculum to be divided in three sets. These are: 1) Core set includes the philosophy,ideology, values, ethics, theory and concepts.

 2) The supportive set deals with knowledge
and skills to assist the core set.

 3) The interdisciplinary set includes theories, concepts
from other disciplines which relates with social work according the students choice(Thomas: 2010).
 

3.Geographical Distribution of Social Work Educational Institutions in India There are about 350 schools in India as per the sources gathered from experts of social work from across the country. The geographical distribution is as shown in the table-1. Among those Karnataka marked with 72 schools/departments, Maharashtra marked with 60 and several south Indian states occupied large number of social work institutions. Jammu & Kashmir, Uttarakand, Himachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya,
Mizoram, Manipur and Bihar only marked with one school/department and there are no schools at all in five of the North-East States. It is also observed that most of the social work educational institutions are located in urban areas; students practice fieldwork in urban places and prefer jobs in cities and metropolis. However, social work professionals are most needed in rural
areas where about 70 percent of the population lives. Prof. Sanjay Bhatt clearly categorized development of social work education in to in
to various stages such as:

1. Initiation/ Inception (1936-46):
It is denoted by establishment of Sir Dorabji Tata Graduate School of Social work established in 1936 and now called as Tata Institute of Social Science (TISS)

2. Experimentation (1947-56):
In this phase, Delhi School of Social Work, Kashi Vidyapith, Gujarat Vidyapith and similar other institutions were established.

3. Expansion (1957-76):
In this phase, many social work educational institutions in Maharasthra, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and other states were established and there was expansion in terms of number of institutions across the length and breadth of the country.

4. Moderation/Stagnation (1977-86):
Unlike expansion phase, in this period not see many new social work education institutions in the country.

5. Explosion (1987)
This phase crossed the 200 mark in terms of social work institutions in India (Thomas: 2010). It is also observed that most of the social work educational institutions are located in urban areas; students practice fieldwork in urban places and prefer jobs in cities and metropolis. However, social work professionals are most needed in rural areas as a huge majority of population lives in rural areas.

4. The Problems and Challenges
Keeping in view of above all the realities, the author has listed out some of the problems and challenges related to professional social work education in India which need to be addressed collectively for improving the standards, enhancing the recognition of the profession and developing literature in consonance with the social context and work force requirements apart from achieving National Council for Social Work.

4.1. Public Recognition of Professional Social Work(er)

Lack of public recognition of social work as a profession is another critical shortcoming that has a lot to do with its future prospects in India. The notion of the professional social work in the people’s mind is in contradiction to an idealized image of conventional social service worker who possess the sterling qualities of heart rather than of mind. The idea of a paid professional social worker is still an anathema to most people in India who even now cling to the notion that doing social work is quintessentially a voluntary activity of a selfless kind. Under Indian conditions ‘service’ and ‘sacrifice’, this is selfless and without any remuneration, is looked upon as higher. A paid social worker, however good, efficient and capable, is more likely to be looked down upon by the people whom he/she serves as a professional. With no self-sacrifice to his/her credit, many persons would not regard the professional social worker as a social worker at all. They would regard him/her as an ‘officer’, a ‘para-professional’ or a ‘mercenary’ (Srivatsava: 1999).

4.2. Low Prevailing Level
The prevailing level of Indian social services and welfare services is extremely low and that most of the voluntary welfare agencies lack the necessary resources to meet some of the basic human needs of common people. Even the Central Social Welfare Board which assists financially more than 12,000 voluntary social welfare
agencies has failed to promote the cause of professional social work. Actually, the Board which employs a large number of specialists has not given proper representation to professional social workers. It is true that formal education for social work has
taken root and about thirty institutions offering graduate courses at present, besides many other which are imparting training in related fields both at the graduate and undergraduate levels. It is also true that a number of organizations do exist which continue to promote the cause of professional social work. But there is no denying the fact that both Indian social work education and its professional organizations have been propagating a system of social work which derives its inspiration mainly from American social work philosophy with its ideas, techniques, structure and goals (Ranjana:
2009).

4.3. Lack of Indigenous Materials or Literature:
The major shortcoming of social work education in India is its inability to sufficiently indigenize its knowledge-base. The basic teaching material with respect to interventionist methods (the holy trinity of social case work, social group work and community organisation) is still primarily American. The challenge, as mentioned before, has not been met and there is often a lingering doubt in the mind of many social work educators and trained social workers whether social work in India can afford to be only concerned with specific individuals, groups and communities when the problems are really the problems of large masses of people (Gore, 1985:151). Many of the problems that are identified as problems of the socially oppressed and economically deprived sections cannot be called adjustmental problems (to use the American phraseology). The social and cultural context of these problems is well beyond the reach of moral-ethical and /or psycho-social paradigm of intervention (Srivatsava: 1999). Since social work literature, modes of practice, approaches, theories, have
been heavily borrowed from western countries, so we need to develop the indigenous approaches too. This requires that the academicians and practitioners must document their experiences so as to facilitate the process of developing indigenous approaches
(Thomas: 2010). At this juncture the authors glad to expresses that School of Social Work (SOSW) at Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) contributed a lot and lot for the social work education by developing social work materials indigenously
under the dynamic leadership of Professor Gracious Thomas, with the support of several eminent social work educators, from different central and state level universities of India as well as from several foreign universities.
4.4. Missing of Fundamental Feature:
The professionals alone have not yet acquired any dominant place to shape  and formulate social policies or to administer social welfare organizations. Again, the professional group itself has not developed any social code which the profession also should accept and practice as the fundamental feature of their profession. In view of  the dominance of foreign influence on the existing professional social work in India and its lack of integration with the cultural mores of Indian society, there is as yet no agreement on a professional code of ethics for the practice of social work. The
profession has failed to develop consciousness of kind and has not created a common platform to express its point of view on broad issues and problems confronting the society. Moreover, the educational institutions offer very few courses on social administration, social planning and social action, and most of the existing courses do not develop intellectual interest and creativity to promote research orientation. In 1975, one of the leading social work educators wrote that social work had remained almost
static for more than 25 years. After a decade this still hold true (Ranjana: 2009).
4.5. Strengthening of Professional Associations
The absence of effective functioning of professional association of social work practitioners and educators is the most pronounced handicap in professional development in the country. Unless these are revived and made effective, the future of the profession of social work is likely to remain bleak (Nanavathi: 1997).
The history of two national level of Association viz. Indian Association of Trained Social Work (IATSW) and ASWI is a checkered one. In addition to these associations, Regional Associations of trained professional social workers are situated
in different states. However only a few of these Regional Associations are active (Gowda: 2010)
In fact, among these national levels associations of the profession, the National Association of Professional Social Worker in India (NAPSWI-2005), Indian Society of Professional Social workers (ISPSW-1970) are doing tremendous work for the professional advancement and for the Continuous Professional Development (CPD) of the educators, practitioners as well as learners of social work across the nation by organizing national level seminars and conferences. The Association of Schools of Social Work in India (ASSWI-1959) did lot of work for the profession after its inception
for several years, unfortunately now it is not in that much active position.

4.6. National Council for Social Work
We need to have national level council to maintain the uniform standards of education and give accreditation to institutions as well to practitioners. Efforts have been made to form National Council in the lines of Medical Council of India through discussions between eminent social work educators and practitioners at various
fora (Thomas: 2010).Unless a uniform system of accreditation on all India bases is developed and enforce, the development of social work education and programmes on sound lines is likely to proceed very slowly for a long time. In 1965, one committee recommended
the establishment of a national social work council, and then another committee in 1978 supported this recommendation. But no action seems to have been taken in this behalf so far. The second event related to the emergence of a national organization of
professional social workers in 1961. Earlier there existed an informal organization of social workers since 1951. This organization, however, had not been effective in attracting a large number of social workers as members (Ranjana: 2009).

4.7. Inbreeding in Several Institutions
Inbreeding that is appointing their own students within the Departments due to political and other pressures. This is resulting in lack of innovation and very stereotyped disinterested practices in teaching, field work practicum as well as research. By absorbing outside candidates only best practices can be adopted.

4.8. Meager Salaries to Social Work Teachers
Low salary and job stagnation, high turn-over, easy burnouts are some of the crucial issues that would be resolved if we are able to bring standardization in the social work teaching, and practice and at the same time portray a desirable and advantageous image of social work profession in the country (Ranjana: 2009). Paying
Meager Salaries to Social Work Teachers lead to poor quality of teaching, practicum and research and best practices cannot be adopted.

4.9. Social Work Educators are not Practitioners
When the educators, practitioners and students are talking about social work as a profession like medicine, law, and engineering etc. the professors of medical college or university practice their profession by visiting wards of hospital along with the medical students, professors of engineering college involve in practice and professors of law college also practice their profession and update their knowledge levels, enhance their competencies to deal with the issues. In social work, the holistic view on teaching, practice and research is missing very much, majority Social Work Educators are found to be comfortable in conventional classroom teaching and rarely found in practice and research domains.

4.10.No activity for Continuous Professional Development (CPD)
According to UGC there are 250 schools/departments of social work in India. Most of them not doing anything for the Continuous Professional Development (CPD) in the form of conducting Workshops, organizing Seminars, doing research studies,
conducting survey, begging field action projects from funding organizations, taking students for study tours to out of the state. Through field action projects/field work labs at the departments / schools lead to the growth opportunity to the staff, learning
opportunity to researchers and students.

4.11. Non-Professionals
The conducted seminar by Association of Schools of Social Work in India (ASSWI) disapproved of the practice of appointing persons who are not trained in social work as members of boards of examiners and board of studies in social work and selection committees for appointing social work teachers by the universities (Nair: 1981). In the same way only social work professionals can teach, guide and train the students of social work like medicine students can only be trained by medical professors, law students only can be capacitated by the law graduates likewise same will be
applicable for social work profession, but unfortunately, In some universities and colleges other discipline teachers such as anthropology, psychology, sociology, geography teach the social work students.

4.12. No Uniform Syllabus and Lake of Standards in Education and Training

We need to standardize the quality of education and training that are provided by numerous schools of social work across the country. These social work educational institutions differ from each other in terms of curricula, generic course vs. specialization
offered, activities, focus, duration, training inputs of fieldwork components and so on. There should be minimum standard of education and fieldwork training inputs provided to students in these institutions (Thomas: 2010).
Across the nation no university is fallowing homogeneous syllabus, guidelines and other standards. Several schools/Departments are not giving any importance for practicum; simply the students are being awarded with the degrees. Undoubtedly standard of education in social work in not that much good.

4.14 Lack of Awareness on ODL
In spite of over thirty years of the existence of Open and Distance Learning (ODL) system in the country and over 40 years of the existence of social work education through ODL in several advanced countries, the social work fraternity in India are yet to recognize the need, relevance, scope and feasibility of ODL for social work education in India. The principal tenet in distance education is social inclusion, justice and equity. In educational management these principles play a crucial role in making available the fruits of development across the different sections of people
aiming at fundamental social work principles of social justice and equity.
Distance Education (DE) and Correspondence Education (CE) are not same. D E is based on multimedia approach. In India there is a Distance Education Council which has a mandate to certify the standards and quality of Distance Education Programmes in various disciplines. All the programmes of IGNOU, the largest Open
University in the world has the approval of University Grants Commission (UGC), Distance Education Council (DEC) and the Association of Indian Universities (AIU). In fact, National Association of Social Work (NASW), International Federation of
Social Work (IFSW) and several councils of social workers in many countries have approved and recognized Distance Education Programmes for several decades now.

4.15. Developing Field (Service) Action Projects
The University Grants Commission (UGC) clearly mentioned in its major of areas of concern for the development of social work education and training in India that is development of field and field service project to provide learning opportunity to the students, growth opportunity to the staff and service opportunity to the people. But the process of developing projects and executing is missing a lot.


Gandhian Ideology and Sarvodaya Movement

Gandhiji’s value system has moulded the social policy
of the government of India since the achievement of
independence. His efforts are reflected in adoption of
constitution guaranteeing freedom of conscience,
worship, speech and expression and prohibited
discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste or
sex; political-administrative consolidation of the
country; progress towards a welfare state focussing
on the problems of social welfare and a thorough
examination of issues associated with them.
Sarvodaya and Social Welfare
Gandhiji conceptualized social welfare as Sarvodaya
meaning “the well being of all in all phases of life”. In the
same time he paid special emphasis on the welfare of
the lowest, humblest-underprivileged such as Harijan,
women, destitute, rural folk. His constructive
programme nor only emphasizes the well being of all
but also deals with all aspects of individual, social and
national life.
Mahatma Gandhi while advocating the cause of social
reform and dedicating himself to eradication of all
social evils, indirectly brought in specific plans of
action. He promoted inter group relations, created
favorable public opinion, launched mass programmes
and induced changes at a mass level. Gandhiji’s
philosophy was based on dignity and worth of individual.
He believed in the dignity of labour and the right of all
people to earn a livelihood. He did not impose his views
on other people, but showed understanding and love
for them.
The main stay of ‘Sarvodaya’, emphasized the values
of Swarajya and Lokniti, that is people have to govern
themselves in order to obtain equity and justice. This
philosophy accepted that people are knowledgeable
workers being interested at one and the same time in
social reform and in helping the individual adjust to
his present circumstances. Gandhiji, thus played a
significant role in preparing the intellectual climate

for the growth of professional social work in India.

Evolution of Social Work Tradition and Education in India

Introduction
A systematic analysis of the social work, its philosophy,
values and principles can only be understood after a
proper reference and attempt is made to understand
the concept of social work and its evolution in India.
This should encompass various perceptions and
viewpoints with regard to its growth and development.
The social work profession is primarily committed to
solidarity with marginalized sections of society. The
basic human rights are very often violated for people,
who lack economic, physical, mental social and/or
emotional resources. Lack of resources leads to
powerlessness and thereby marginalization of people
by the social, economic and political systems.
Marginalized people are vulnerable to deprivation and
exploitation by those who have control over resources.
Thus, this profession recognizes that marginalized
people need to be empowered so that they themselves
play a decisive role for their development and welfare.
Empowerment is the process of gaining control over
self as well as the resources, which determine power.
This process aims at reforming the nature and
direction of the systemic forces, which marginalizes
the powerless.
characteristic was doing or initiating welfare and
common good of all, the glimpses of which can be found
in folk tales and legends in old literary works, Smiritis
or Dhramsastras. The earliest mention to charity can
be obtained from Rigveda which encourages charity
by saying “May the one who gives shine most”. The
Arthasastras, ascribed to Kautilya is one of the oldest
works in polity- that refers to the construction work
for public good by joint efforts of villagers. It also
mentions social work as care of children, old or invalid
in case of no protectors. Special regulations were
established for persons living in cities for common good.
Collective charity was popular form of social work, of
which progress of education or Vidyadana was an
important one as one of the numerous Jatakas reflect.
Other Upanashidas like Brihadarnayaka, Chhandogya
and Taittiriya prescribes that every householder must
practice charity.
Next to education, reference may be made to religion,
which took precedence over everything else to the
people of ancient India. One of the popular methods of
performing social activities, hence was Yagnas. The
main aim of yagnas was the common welfare of all,
devoid of any personal benefit or profit. There were
several Yagnashalas, which were like classrooms
wherein students were instilled with the feeling of
working without the egocentric desires. This learning
and spirit transcended to the home, workplace and in
the ordinary community life. The community was urged
to move ahead as one entity and achieve progress.
According to Geeta privileged sections must strive
towards the fulfilment of its duty to serve the poor,
handicapped and underprivileged.
The communitarian structure of early Vedic period
functioned like an extended family, where everybody
Social Reform in Medieval Period (1206-1706)
The approach followed while mentioning the social
reform activities during the medieval period would be
to focus not on individual kings and their achievements
but to the extent of their contribution to changes in
social institutions and structure. The Muslim Sultanate
who formed a significant phase of the medieval period
were motivated and driven by the same spirit of social
service in the fields of religion and education. The
practical needs of consolidating conquered territory and
providing efficient administration in a foreign country
necessitated the delineation of the role and functions
of the kings. These duties included maintenance of
peace, protection from external forces, levying of taxes
and providing justice to subjects. Beyond these limited
secular functions, the rulers took little interest in
promoting the general welfare of the masses. The
religion enjoined upon the Muslims to render help to
the underprivileged by the payment of Zakat, “the
annual legal alms of five things, namely money, cattle,
grain, fruit and merchandise”. Provision of drinking
water, building of mosques, provision of sarais, charity
to poor was regarded as pious act.
Humayun was the pioneer amongst the Muslim rulers
to make the efforts to prohibit Sati system. Akbar was
an illustrious ruler who took initiatives in bringing
reforms in Indian society by abolishing slavery in 1583.
He introduced equality among people irrespective of
class and religion, and established comprehensive
system of poor relief which was of two types: granting
relief in cash/kind to every needy person who made
requests for the same and the other was systematic
and organized assistance provided regularly.
Ram Krishna Mission, Indian Social Conference,
Servants of India Society etc.
However, this social reform movement confined to
small elitist segment of the population mostly
consisting of English speaking middle class. But with
the advent of Gandhiji on the scene, the entire social
reform and political independence movement took a
turn. Significantly, Gandhiji linked political movement
with the social movement and transformed this into a
mass movement with the participation of all sections
of population notably women and peasants and lower
castes.
The establishment of the first school of social work,
Sir Dorabji Tata Graduate School of Social Work,
Bombay in 1936 marks a watershed in training and
education of social work profession. Subsequently,
several institutes of social work were established in
various parts of the country.
After independence, the government shifted towards
the welfare approach and took several areas of social
work under its purview. The popularity of ideas of
social change, social development, institutional change
and programmes of family planning, elimination of mass
poverty and reduction of income gaps among the
population reflect the direction of social orientation

towards seeking and striving to achieve the goals.

History of Social Work in The United States of America

The English Poor Law legislation’s and related
developments provided the background for the
development of American systems of relief. The colonists
from England, who came in the early and midseventeenth
century, brought with them English laws,
customs, institutions and ideas and implanted them
in America.
Three Social Movements
During the last half of the 19th century, the US
experienced an increase in social problems as a result
of rapid industrialization, urbanization, and
immigration, together with the massive growth of the
population. In response to these problems, three social
movements began that formed the basis for the
development of the social work profession:
1) The Charity Organization Societies (COS)
movement, which began in 1877 in Buffalo, New
York;
2) The Settlement House movement, which began in
1886 in New York City; and
3) The Child Welfare movement, which was a result
of several loosely related developments, notably the
Children’s Aid Society and the Society for the
Prevention of Cruelty to Children, which began in
New York City in 1853 and 1875, respectively.
Let us look at these movements in more detail as they
form the basis for future developments.
COS Movement
The settlement house movement and the child welfare
movement eventually made important contributions to
the development of the social work profession, but it
is in the COS movement that the origin of the
profession is to be found.
S. Humpherys Gurteen, an English cleric who had been
impressed with charity organization in London, founded
the first COS in the United States in Buffalo, New
York, in 1877. The Buffalo COS served as a model for
rapid development of similar organizations. Within 15
years, there were COS agencies in 92 American cities.
The beginning of professional approach to the problems
of human need can be seen in the philosophy of COS
movement. The “scientific charity” attitude adopted by
the COS enabled them to understand and cure poverty
and family disorganization rather than merely assisting
the poor. The charity organizations wanted to apply
science to social welfare in the same way that it had
been applied to medicine and engineering.
The COS leaders sought to replace chaotic charity with
a rational system that would stress investigation, coordination,
and personal service. Each case was to be
considered individually, thoroughly investigated and
assigned to a “friendly visitor.” The techniques used
by the friendly visitors consisted of personal attributes
such as sympathy, tact, patience, and wise advice. The
COS friendly visitors, most of them women, are the
true forerunners of today’s social workers.
Besides, the COS movement fostered the development
of the family service agencies of today, the practice of
family casework, family counselling, schools of social
work, employment services, legal aid, and many other
programs which are a part and parcel of social work
today.
In addition to these contributions may be listed the
establishment of the first social work publication,
Charities Review, which was merged into The Survey in
1907 and continued publication until 1952.
Settlement House Movement
Another significant development of social services in
America has been that of the social settlement house.
Settlement houses in the United States began in the
late 1800s and were modelled after Toynbee Hall,
founded in England in 1884 by Samuel Barnett. Many
settlement houses were established in cities across
the country, including Chicago’s Hull House, started
by Jane Addams and Ellen Gates Starr in 1889.
The settlement house movement, which combined
social advocacy and social services, was a response to
the social disorganization that resulted from
widespread industrialization, urbanization and
immigration. Through group work and neighbourhood
organizing strategies, the settlement house workers
established neighbourhood centres and offered services
such as citizenship training, adult education,
counselling, recreation, and day care.
The settlement house workers were young, idealistic
college graduates from wealthy families who lived
among the poor as “settlers” and thereby experienced
the harsh realities. For the most part, they were
volunteers and community leaders and not employed
as social work professionals.
The settlement house leaders believed that by changing
neighbourhood they can improve communities and by
changing communities they can develop a better
society. The seeds of social work methods, namely,
Group Work, Social Action and Community
Organization, were thus sown in the settlement house
movement.
Child Welfare Movement
The Children’s Aid Society (1853) and the Society for
the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (1875) which
began in New York City formed the basic elements of
a child welfare movement. However, the beginnings of
the Child Welfare movement can be traced back to
1729 when the Ursuline sisters established an
institution in New Orleans for children of parents
massacred by Indians.
The child welfare agencies had limited aims. They were
basically concerned with “rescuing” children from
inadequate homes or from the streets and finding for
them wholesome living situations. Once their goals
were accomplished, the agencies considered their job

to be over.

History of Social Work in the United Kingdom

In primitive society, sometimes referred as the ‘folk
society’, the larger family or tribe took over the support
of those whose needs were not satisfied in the normal
way. Children deprived of parental support were taken
into the homes of relatives or adopted by childless
couples. Food resources were shared among relatives
and neighbours. In course of time, when the feudal
system gave way to the wage economy, legislation was
enacted to compel the poor to work. Whipping,
imprisonment, and even death punished begging.
Role of the Church
In Europe, in the early Christian era, the folk tradition
continued and the faithful considered it a religious
obligation to care for those members of the group who
could not care for themselves. Religion provided the
greatest motivation for charity. The church, especially
the monasteries, became the centres for distributing
food, medical aid and shelter. Alms were collected in
the parish and distributed by the parish priest and
other clergymen who knew the individuals and their
situation.
Welfare Becomes a State Responsibility
The shift from church responsibility to government
responsibility for relief is seen first in the restrictive
legislation forbidding begging and vagrancy. In England
between 1350 and 1530, a series of laws were enacted,
known as the “Statutes of Labourers,” designed to force
the poor to work. The decreasing authority of the
church and the increasing tendency to shift
responsibility to governmental authorities gave rise in
England to a series of measures which culminated in
the famous Elizabethan Poor Law of 1601.
The Elizabethan Poor Law 1601
The Poor Law of 1601 was a codification of the preceding
poor relief legislation. The statute represented the final
form of poor law legislation in England after three
generations of political, religious, and economic
changes that required government action.
The law distinguished three classes of the poor:
1) The able-bodied poor were called “sturdy beggars”
and were forced to work in the house of correction
or workhouse. Those who refused to work in the
house of correction were put in the stocks or in
jail.
2) The impotent poor were people unable to work—the
sick, the old, the blind, the deaf-mute, the lame,
the demented and mothers with young children.
They were placed in the almshouse where they
were to help within the limits of their capacities.
If they had a place to live, they were given “outdoor
relief” in the form of food, clothes and fuel.
3) Dependent children were orphans and children who
had been deserted by their parents or whose
parents were so poor that they could not support
them. Children eight years and older able to do
some domestic and other work were indentured
with a townsman.
The Poor Law of 1601 set the pattern of public relief
under governmental responsibility for Great Britain for
300 years. It established the principle that the local
60 Introduction to Social Work
community, namely the parish, had to organize and
finance poor relief for its residents. The overseers of
the poor administered the poor law in the parish. Their
function was to receive the application of the poor
person for relief, to investigate his or her condition,
and to decide whether he or she was eligible for relief.
Influence of The Elizabethan Poor Law
Though there were similar reform plans advocated in
Europe; it is the Poor Law of 1601, sometimes known
as 43 Elizabeth, which was most influential in the
development of public welfare and social work. There
are several important principles in the English Poor
Law, which continue to have a dominating influence
on welfare legislation four centuries later.
1) The principle of the state’s responsibility for relief
is universally adopted and has never been
seriously questioned. It is in tune with democratic
philosophy as well as with the principle of the
separation of church and state.
2) The principle of local responsibility for welfare
enunciated in the Poor Law goes back to 1388 and
is designed to discourage vagrancy. It
stipulates that “sturdy beggars” to return to their
birthplaces and there seek relief.
3) A third principle stipulated differential treatment
of individuals according to categories: the
deserving as against the undeserving poor,
children, the aged, and the sick. This principle
is based on the theory that certain types
of unfortunate people have a grater claim on the
community than other types.
4) The Poor Law also delineated family responsibility
for aiding dependants. Children, grandchildren,
parents, and grandparents were designated as
“legally liable” relatives.
The Elizabethan Poor Law was noteworthy and
progressive when it was enacted. It has served as the
basis for both English and American public welfare.
The Poor Law Revisions: 1834-1909
In 1834 a Parliamentary Commission presented a report
which aimed to revise the Elizabethan and post-
Elizabethan Poor Laws. Upon the basis of the
committee’s report legislation was enacted enunciating
the following principles: (a) doctrine of least eligibility,
(b) re-establishment of the workhouse test, and (c)
centralization of control.
The doctrine of least eligibility meant that the condition
of paupers shall in no case be so eligible as the
condition of persons of the lowest class subsisting on
the fruits of their own industry. In other words, no
person receiving aid was to be as well off. According to
the second principle, the able-bodied poor could apply
for assistance in the public workhouse, but refusal to
accept the lodging and fare of the workhouse debarred
them from qualifying for any aid. Outdoor relief was
reduced to an absolute minimum. As per the third
principle, a central authority consisting of three Poor
Law Commissioners had power to consolidate and coordinate
poor law services throughout the land.
Parishes were no longer to be the administrative units.
Between 1834 and 1909 there were numerous changes
in Poor Law legislation, the cumulative effect of which
was to veer the entire system away from the principles
of 1834. The most important changes were those that
began to develop specialized care for certain
disadvantaged groups. For instance, for dependent
children district schools and foster homes were
provided and for the insane and feeble-minded
specialized institutions were started.
A more positive approach to the poor laws can be seen
in The Poor Law Report of 1909. The report stressed
curative treatment and rehabilitation rather than
repression, and provision for all in the place of the
selective workhouse test. If the principles of 1834
provided a ‘framework of repression’, those of 1909 may
be termed as the ‘framework of prevention’.
The Beveridge Report
In 1942, Sir William Beveridge, chairman of the Inter-
Departmental Committee on Social Insurance and
Allied Services, presented the Committee’s Report to
the government. The report emphasized four major
principles:
1) Every citizen to be covered,
2) The major risks of loss of earning power -- sickness,
unemployment, accident, old age, widowhood,
maternity-- to be included in a single insurance,
3) A flat rate of contribution to be paid regardless of
the contributor’s income, and
4) A flat rate of benefit to be paid, also without regard
to income, as a right to all who qualify.
Beveridge emphasized that the underlined social
philosophy of his plan was to secure the British against
want and other social evils. Everyone is entitled to
benefits, which include maternity, sickness,
unemployment, industrial injury, retirement and grant
for widows. The related services are Family Allowances,
National Health Services and National Assistance.
The Beveridge Report of 1942 takes its place as one of
the great documents in English Poor Law history ---
601, 1834, 1909, and 1942. The Report became the
foundation of the modern social welfare legislation for
UK.
Beginnings of the COS Movement and Settlement
House Movement
In England, where the problem of competing and
overlapping social services in London had been
increasing over the years, a group of public-spirited
citizens founded in 1869 the London Charity
Organization Society (COS). Octavia Hill and Samuel
Barnett were two of these founders. In her work as
housing reformer, Octavia Hill introduced a system of
“friendly rent collecting” as a method of improving slum
housing.
Octavia Hill communicated to the volunteers certain
principles or laws to be followed in their activities,
through weekly meetings and ‘Letters to Fellow
Workers’. She stressed that ‘each case and each
situation must be individualised.’ Everyone must be
treated with respect for his or her privacy and
independence. She advised her workers not to judge
the tenants by their personal standards. She believed
in the value of dignity of even the most degraded of
her tenants.
Samuel Augustus Barnett was the founder of Toynbee
Hall, the first settlement house, in which wealthy
Oxford students “settled” in an attempt to improve living
conditions in the slums of Whitechapel. The basic idea
was to bring the educated in contact with the poor for
their mutual benefit. Realization had dawned on the
Christian Socialists that mere distribution of charity
does not solve problems. In order to better understand
the situation of poverty and underdevelopment, one
needed to live with the poor and listen to their
problems.
After outlining the beginnings in England, we shall
now see the growth and spread of the social work

profession in the United States.